Clinical Trial Risk Tool featured in Clinical Leader

· Thomas Wood
Clinical Trial Risk Tool featured in Clinical Leader

The Clinical Trial Risk Tool has been featured in a guest column by Thomas Wood, director of Fast Data Science, in Clinical Leader, titled A Tool To Tackle The Risk Of Uninformative Trials, in cooperation with Abby Proch, Executive Editor at Clinical Leader.

In this article, Thomas Wood discusses the issue of uninformative clinical trials in pharmaceutical research. Uninformative trials fail to provide meaningful results, either because they don’t address key questions or are poorly designed. These trials waste resources, expose participants to unnecessary risks, and hinder progress in medical knowledge.

Wood uses the definition of “uninformative trials” from Zarin et al (2019)[1] as trials that do not deliver informative results, even though the investigated treatment may be effective or ineffective. An informative trial, according to experts, must meet five conditions: addressing an important question, providing meaningful evidence, being feasible, conducted scientifically, and reporting methods and results promptly.

The Clinical Trial Risk Tool was created to prevent such trials by providing features like a clinical trial budget estimator based on real-world cost data. The development of the first version of the tool was published in Gates Open Research[2]. In future, the tool could retrieve past trials with similar endpoints or inclusion/exclusion criteria to improve protocol design. It could also generate personalised feedback for different stakeholders, such as medical professionals, financial planners, and patient advocates.

Fast Data Science’s Clinical Trial Risk Tool offers a solution by allowing users to upload trial protocols, where AI analyzes the document for risk and cost factors. The tool estimates trial costs and identifies risks, helping to avoid uninformative outcomes early in the design process.

References

  1. Zarin, Deborah A., Steven N. Goodman, and Jonathan Kimmelman. “Harms from uninformative clinical trials.” Jama 322.9 (2019): 813-814, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31343666/
  2. Wood, Thomas A., and Douglas McNair. “Clinical Trial Risk Tool: software application using natural language processing to identify the risk of trial uninformativeness.” Gates Open Research 7.56 (2023): 56. https://gatesopenresearch.org/articles/7-56/v1
  3. Wood, Thomas A., A Tool To Tackle The Risk Of Uninformative Trials, Clinical Leader, 2025.

Unlock Your Future in NLP!

Dive into the world of Natural Language Processing! Explore cutting-edge NLP roles that match your skills and passions.

Explore NLP Jobs

How good are the best large language models in 2026?
Generative aiLegal ai

How good are the best large language models in 2026?

Which is the best AI for legal questions in 2026? We tested 16 Large Language Models (AIs) from the last two years on a law exam.

Should AI companies be allowed to mine creative content to train models?
Legal ai

Should AI companies be allowed to mine creative content to train models?

The effects of AI companies training on creative works When AI companies train models on text, video and images from creative industries, the end product is an AI model which can create near-human quality visual designs or copywriting. Many artists have argued the AI companies are exploiting creatives by profiting from their work, while the original creators do not receive any compensation. By flooding the market with low-cost content, AI has driven down rates for human artists, which is threatening creative careers.

Are we in an AI bubble?
Generative ai

Are we in an AI bubble?

None of the content of this article constitutes investment advice. Few would dispute that the global economy is currently in an AI boom. However, opinions are divided over whether this boom also constitutes a bubble.

What we can do for you

Transform Unstructured Data into Actionable Insights

Contact us